Fall 2026 Founding Cohort · 3–5 schools

The patterns averaged grades hide.

Old gradebooks summarize last week's tests.

Try it with your classWatch the Mastery Loop

Evidence chain

From one response to a teacher decision.

The first post-hero proof points are the ones a district evaluator needs to see: learning science, teacher control, and standards-level traceability.

Learning science

2 sigma

Bloom's tutoring benchmark sets the aspiration: find the gap early enough for a teacher to respond.

Teacher control

Draft

Rubric scores, groups, and lesson changes stay editable until teacher review.

Standards graph

3-7 skills

Each gap traces to learning components and standards, not a generic practice queue.

Fall 2026 Founding Cohort · 3–5 schoolsBuilt for pilot review · Evidence chain · Teacher approval · LMS fit

Evidence walkthrough

A student's work becomes tomorrow's decision.

Follow the evidence chain a teacher can inspect: artifact, mastery estimate, prerequisite risk, and a draft action for review.

01 / 04 · EVIDENCE

Start with the work, not an average.

Hologram captures Sophia's response, the answer path, and the exact step that changed the result. The artifact stays attached to every recommendation.

Sophia M. · Math 6 · Today

Problem

3(x + 4) = 21

Sophia's response

3x + 4 = 21

Evidence captured

02 / 04 · MASTERY

Keep the gradebook familiar while the standards model gets sharper.

The gradebook can still read 72%. The standards model now shows Sophia's distributive-property mastery as developing, updated from the same piece of evidence.

Two views · One submission

Gradebook

Sophia M.72%

Letter grade · C-

Standards mastery

6.EE.A.3 · Apply the distributive property0.43

Started 0.71

ProficientDeveloping

03 / 04 · FORECAST

Trace tomorrow's risk to the prerequisite underneath it.

Hologram traces the failed distribution back through the standards graph. The next standard, 7.EE.B.4 (Solve linear equations), depends on it. Readiness for tomorrow's assessment drops to 41%.

Standards graph · Forecast

Tomorrow's readiness · 7.EE.B.4

41%was 78%

Upcoming assessment risk

04 / 04 · PLAN

Draft the next move. Let the teacher decide.

By tomorrow morning, the lesson plan has a 12-minute warm-up on the distributive property and a small-group review for Sophia, Marcus, and Olivia. The recommendation stays pending until the teacher approves.

Tomorrow morning · Teacher view

Recommended pivotTomorrow's warm-up: 6.EE.A.3 distributive property review (12 min)

Review group: Sophia M., Marcus T., Olivia P.

Recommended by Hologram

Recommended for teacher approval

Hologram has prepared the warm-up and small-group review. Approve, edit, or decline before the action queues.

6.EE.A.3Apply the distributive property

Evidence visibleApproval requiredAction queues only after approval

Schedule recommendationReview and approve

Action queues only after approval

pattern view

The class pattern appears.

Sophia, Marcus, and Olivia show the same distributive-property gap across recent work. Separate gradebook rows become one instructional pattern.

Student	6.EE.A.2	6.EE.A.3	7.EE.B.4	Review	Trend
Sophia M.					↓
Marcus J.					↓
Olivia P.					↓

chain view

The prerequisite chain explains it.

Hologram traces 6.EE.A.3 through the standards graph and shows why tomorrow's 7.EE.B.4 lesson is at risk.

6.EE.A.2Write and evaluate expressionsReady

6.EE.A.3Apply distributive propertyGap

7.EE.B.4Solve linear equationsGoal

draft view

The intervention stays a draft.

A 12-minute warm-up and small-group review are prepared for teacher approval, with the evidence attached.

Q13(x + 4)distribution

Q22(a + 5)guided

Q34(y - 2)practice

Q45(n + 1)exit check

Tagged to6.EE.A.3

Evidence chain

Grade, mastery, gap: one response.

Hologram shows the evidence behind a recommendation: rubric evidence, mastery update, prerequisite risk, and a teacher-reviewed intervention draft.

Evidence review consolePreview mode · Teacher approval required

01Artifact
Sophia's work is parsed line by line.
02Rubric evidence
The 6.EE.A.3 distribution error is attached to the rubric.
03Mastery update
The estimate updates from approved evidence, not averages.
04Prerequisite risk
Tomorrow's 7.EE.B.4 readiness changes because the prerequisite is weak.
05Draft action
A review mini-lesson is prepared for teacher approval.

Unit 3 · Linear Equations

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

3(x + 4) = 21original

3x + 4 = 216.EE.A.3

3x = 17downstream step

x = 17/3answer follows error

Matched evidenceLine 2 feeds 6.EE.A.3 and the mastery estimate.

The grading signal stays attached to the work sample, so the recommendation can be checked before approval.

Identifies equation type
Applies distributive property6.EE.A.3
Isolates the variable
Verifies solution

Solve linear equations with variables on one side

Before68%

After68%

Based on 7 observations · posterior estimate

6.EE.A.2mastered

Write and evaluate expressions

91%

6.EE.A.3gap

Apply distributive property

48%

7.EE.B.4current

Solve linear equations

52%

Student artifact

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

3x + 4 = 216.EE.A.3

The recommendation stays tied to the visible work sample, so the teacher can review the reasoning before anything changes.

01
Rubric evidence
Line 2 shows the distributive-property error.
6.EE.A.3
02
Mastery update
7.EE.B.4 changes from approved evidence.
68% -> 52%
03
Prerequisite risk
6.EE.A.3 is weak enough to affect tomorrow's equation work.
Gap
04
Teacher draft
A review mini-lesson is prepared, not assigned.
~12 min

Teacher approvalDraft 6.EE.A.3 review mini-lesson

Distributive property gap detected. Review before continuing 7.EE.B.4 to reduce compounding error.

Step 1 of 7: Ready

Preview only. Teacher approval required before grades, groups, or lessons change.

Research principles

Bounded claims, visible reasoning.

Hologram uses learning-science principles to organize evidence and support decisions. It does not ask districts to accept black-box claims or unmeasured outcomes.

Pilot outcomes are not yet available; this section explains the design basis and its limits.

Research principle
Formative assessment
Black & Wiliam · Hattie
Product behavior
Student work becomes evidence before the next lesson.
Classroom outcome
Teachers see what to reteach while there is still time to act.
Research supports formative assessment broadly; Hologram's own pilot outcomes are not yet available.
Research principle
Mastery learning
Bloom
Product behavior
Standards mastery updates separately from percentage grades.
Classroom outcome
Teachers can distinguish score performance from standard readiness.
Used as design grounding, not as a claim of measured Hologram effect.
Research principle
Bayesian Knowledge Tracing
Corbett & Anderson
Product behavior
New evidence updates a learner model over time.
Classroom outcome
Readiness estimates change as students submit work.
Model estimates are decision support and remain teacher-reviewed.
Research principle
Prerequisite learning
Standards graph
Product behavior
Hologram traces a current error back to a prerequisite standard.
Classroom outcome
Teachers can reteach the smaller missing skill before advancing.
Prerequisite links require ongoing curriculum and teacher review.
Research principle
Teacher review
Human-in-the-loop design
Product behavior
Recommendations stay pending until approved.
Classroom outcome
Teachers keep control over grades, interventions, and schedule changes.
Evidence informs the draft. Teachers make the call.

Evidence informs the draft. Teachers make the call.

Questions

What schools ask before the pilot.

Does Hologram replace our existing LMS?

No. Hologram launches inside your existing LMS through LTI 1.3. Teachers continue using the LMS they already know. Hologram adds the diagnostic mastery layer beside it for the 30-day pilot.

Can Hologram change grades or assign work on its own?

What does Hologram grade?

Who is the Fall 2026 pilot for?

How is student data handled?

Founding cohort

Ready to see every student?

Hologram is opening a small Fall 2026 founding cohort for 3-5 schools. Start with middle school math, run beside your LMS, and evaluate the evidence chain before any broader rollout.

Apply for the Founding Cohort Read the research

FERPA review · COPPA review · LTI 1.3

Student

6.EE.A.2

6.EE.A.3

7.EE.B.4

Review

Trend

Sophia M.

↓

Marcus J.

↓

Olivia P.

↓

The patterns averaged grades hide.

From one response to a teacher decision.

A student's work becomes tomorrow's decision.

Start with the work, not an average.

Keep the gradebook familiar while the standards model gets sharper.

Trace tomorrow's risk to the prerequisite underneath it.

Draft the next move. Let the teacher decide.

Recommended for teacher approval

The same pattern scales to the class.

The class pattern appears.

The prerequisite chain explains it.

The intervention stays a draft.

Grade, mastery, gap: one response.

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

Formative assessment

Mastery learning

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing

Prerequisite learning

Teacher review

What schools ask before the pilot.

Ready to see every student?

The patterns averaged grades hide.

From one response to a teacher decision.

A student's work becomes tomorrow's decision.

Start with the work, not an average.

Keep the gradebook familiar while the standards model gets sharper.

Trace tomorrow's risk to the prerequisite underneath it.

Draft the next move. Let the teacher decide.

Recommended for teacher approval

The same pattern scales to the class.

The class pattern appears.

The prerequisite chain explains it.

The intervention stays a draft.

Grade, mastery, gap: one response.

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

Solve for x: 3(x + 4) = 21

Formative assessment

Mastery learning

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing

Prerequisite learning

Teacher review

What schools ask before the pilot.

Ready to see every student?