Skip to main content
hologram
  • Product
  • For Teachers
  • For Districts
  • Research
Try it with your class

For teachers

Your plan adapts every night.

Tonight, Hologram reviews your students' work against state standards. Tomorrow morning, you walk in to a plan that already targets the gaps. Each day it gets sharper.

Try Hologram with your classSee the platform
Daily adaptive loopevery night
01TodayStudent does today's work
02TonightHologram reviews + BKT updates mastery
03Tomorrow morningPlan ready, awaiting your approval
04TomorrowClass addresses the gaps — loop continues
HologramHologram Oracle
Mastery view

Eight students. Same prerequisite. One trace.

8students stuck on the same gapTraced two units back to fractional exponents.
Standard7.RP.A.2b — proportional reasoningClass mastery 42% — 8 students clustered below threshold.42%
Prerequisite traceFractional exponents (two units back)Hologram walked the graph backward to the upstream gap.Found
Suggested nextReteach group ready for tomorrowPre-built around the shared prerequisite.Group

Built for the classroom

  • Canvas LTI 1.3
  • FERPA-aligned design
  • COPPA-aware
  • Research-backed mastery model

The mechanic

Today's class. Tonight's update. Tomorrow's plan.

Daily adaptive loop

One loop. Every night. Plan gets sharper.

Hologram folds grading, mastery, and lesson-plan adaptation into a single cycle that runs every night. You approve every change.

01Today

Student does today's work.

Assignment in Canvas, problem set, essay — whatever the lesson called for.

02Tonight

Hologram reviews against standards.

Submissions decompose per sub-skill. BKT updates mastery. Cross-class clusters surface.

03Tomorrow morning

Plan ready, awaiting your approval.

Small groups pre-built around shared prereqs. Mini-lessons drafted. You approve, adjust, or override.

04Tomorrow

Class addresses the gaps.

Today's work feeds tonight's update. Loop continues.

↻ Loop continues — today's class feeds tonight's update.

Step 1 of 3 · Tonight

Hologram reviews today's work against standards.

Evidence-anchored grading

AI proposes mastery scores; evidence is attached to every claim.

No more grading on Sunday. Every submission decomposes against state standards overnight, with evidence quoted per sub-skill. You review, adjust, or override before anything changes.

trust, not magic

Every AI score,
anchored in evidence.

Hologram highlights the exact phrases that earned each point — so every score is reviewable, adjustable, and defensible.

MR
Ms. Reyes
7th Grade ELA · Period 3 · Constructed Response
Response prompt · RL.7.5
Prompt:Explain how O. Henry uses story structure in “The Gift of the Magi” — particularly the parallel narratives of Jim and Della — to create irony. Cite specific evidence from the text.
Marcus Johnson
· 187 words · submitted 3:12 PM
draft 1

O. Henry uses Evidence for C1: parallel structure in 'The Gift of the Magi' to build irony between Jim and Della. Both characters sell their most valuable possessions to buy gifts for each other. Evidence for C2: Della sells her long, beautiful hair to buy Jim a platinum chain for his watch. At the same time, without knowing what Della is doing, Evidence for C2: Jim sells his gold watch to buy Della combs for her hair.

The parallel structure creates irony because Evidence for C3: each gift becomes useless. Evidence for C3: Della's combs cannot be used because she has no hair. Jim's chain cannot be used because he sold his watch. O. Henry shows that 'the magi were wise men — wonderfully wise men' and that Jim and Della are also wise because they gave up what they valued most for each other.

The story's structure makes the ending ironic because the reader expects the gifts to bring joy but instead they can't be used. However, Evidence for C4: the love between Jim and Della is what really matters.

RL.7.54 criteria · 16 pts
Analyze how form and structure of a text contribute to its meaning
C1Identifies the structural device
0 / 4
Evidence from responseNames the device but does not analyze how parallel structure produces irony — partial credit.
C2Cites specific textual evidence
0 / 4
Evidence from response · 2 citationsTwo concrete, accurate citations. Full credit.
C3Explains how structure creates irony
0 / 4
Evidence from response · 2 citationsExplains surface-level irony clearly but does not analyze deeper dramatic effect — partial credit.
C4Connects structure to theme or meaning
0 / 4
Evidence from responseGestures at theme but does not develop it or connect structure → meaning. Minimal credit.
Total0 / 16Proficient
Confidence
0.00
AI pre-score complete · awaiting teacher review
✓ Every score linked to verbatim evidence · you can adjust any criterion before publishing
Every AI grade produces a traceable audit log.
Audit record: audit-id a7f3-2891 · model-v hologram-grade-2.1 · confidence 0.89 · teacher-review pending — available to districts on export for compliance review.
HologramTeacher mobile
Period 3 Pre-Algebra

Grade, approve, and plan the next group from one screen.

3students share a gapOrder of operations is blocking proportional reasoning.
QueueUnit Rate Word ProblemsAI draft is ready for teacher review with evidence highlights.12
RubricDistributive property needs reviewThe recommendation points to the exact line of student work.6.EE.A.3
PlanSmall group suggestedMarcus, Olivia, and Diego need a short prerequisite reteach.15m
ReviewDraft scoreeditable
ApproveMasteryupdates dashboard
GroupInterventionready for tomorrow

Step 2 of 3 · Morning

You walk in to a plan that already targets the gaps.

Hologram Oracle

Hologram Oracle reveals where eight students are stuck on the same prereq.

Hologram traces backward through the prerequisite graph and clusters students with shared upstream gaps. Visible the moment you open Oracle — no diagnostic to run, no spreadsheet to filter.

app.hologramlearning.com/oracle
Teacher mastery heatmap showing students across math standards with AI-identified prerequisite gaps and one-click intervention actions
HologramHologram Oracle
Mastery view

Eight students. Same prerequisite. One trace.

8students stuck on the same gapTraced two units back to fractional exponents.
Standard7.RP.A.2b — proportional reasoningClass mastery 42% — 8 students clustered below threshold.42%
Prerequisite traceFractional exponents (two units back)Hologram walked the graph backward to the upstream gap.Found
Suggested nextReteach group ready for tomorrowPre-built around the shared prerequisite.Group

Step 3 of 3 · Today's plan

Hologram drafts tomorrow's small groups.

Intervention drafting

Pre-built reteach groups around the prerequisite they share.

Your dashboard surfaces shared prerequisite gaps and pre-builds the smallest useful reteach group. Hologram drafts the mini-lesson; you approve, adjust, or override.

closing the loop

From discovery to action,
in one teacher click.

Hologram doesn’t stop at “here’s the gap.” It generates the aligned intervention — scoped to the right students, grounded in research, ready for teacher review.

MG
Ms. Garcia
7th Grade Science · Period 4 · Unit: Matter & Its Interactions
FLAGGED STANDARDMS-PS1-2
Analyze data on properties of substances before and after reactions
Students at risk5
Pattern detected · quiz 3
All 5 students classified “water boiling” and “salt dissolving” as chemical changes. Common misconception: any change in appearance equals a chemical change.
Tracing prerequisite chain…
Root cause detected
5.PS1-4→prereq for MS-PS1-2
Distinguish physical from chemical changes
0.91confidence
Hologram-generatedEvidence-based · NGSS-aligned · Est. 35 min total
Targeting 5.PS1-4 → before re-assessing MS-PS1-2
Virtual lab — Mix & classify
Simulation · 5 scenarios · observational
Students observe and classify each: vinegar + baking soda, salt dissolving, ice melting, wood burning, rust forming. Each scenario requires a classification + supporting evidence.
15 min
Guided reflection with adaptive feedback
3 short-response prompts · AI-scored
Prompts target the exact misconception from quiz 3: “What evidence would tell you a chemical change occurred?” — Hologram gives targeted feedback based on the response.
8 min
Targeted practice — Classification items
4 scored items · mastery threshold 3 of 4
Items drawn from state NGSS assessment bank, aligned to 5.PS1-4. Score ≥ 3/4 unlocks re-attempt on MS-PS1-2 quiz.
12 min
PublishToday · 3:45 PM
DueFri, Apr 24 · 11:59 PM
RemeasureTue, Apr 28 · quiz 4
Assigned to
MJTOPRCWZM
5 students auto-matched from flagged group · invisible to rest of class
Intervention ready · awaiting teacher approval
✓ Generated in 0.8s · every step sourced from research · teacher owns final publish
RESEARCH BASIS · why this intervention is structured this way
Lab-before-concept sequencingSchwartz & Bransford (1998)·Retrieval practice with feedbackKarpicke (2012)·Explicit misconception confrontationPosner et al. (1982)·Principles of instructionRosenshine (2012)
HologramTeacher mobile
Period 3 Pre-Algebra

Grade, approve, and plan the next group from one screen.

3students share a gapOrder of operations is blocking proportional reasoning.
QueueUnit Rate Word ProblemsAI draft is ready for teacher review with evidence highlights.12
RubricDistributive property needs reviewThe recommendation points to the exact line of student work.6.EE.A.3
PlanSmall group suggestedMarcus, Olivia, and Diego need a short prerequisite reteach.15m
ReviewDraft scoreeditable
ApproveMasteryupdates dashboard
GroupInterventionready for tomorrow

For students who hit a wall during work time, Hologram Study Buddy asks the next question — never the answer. See the Socratic tutor on /platform.

The loop in motion

Day 1 to Day 14: how the plan sharpens.

First two weeks

Adoption is gradual; the loop builds with evidence.

The system needs evidence to build the prerequisite graph. Here's a directional timeline of a teacher's first two weeks with Hologram.

Day 1You start here

Setup. First grading run, every claim reviewed.

Roster pulls from Canvas via LTI. First assignment is graded with the teacher reviewing every AI-suggested claim before approving.

Expect Day 1 to run a little longer than normal grading; the teacher is calibrating the AI's suggestions.

Day 3

First plan auto-update.

Hologram surfaces a small group sharing one prerequisite gap. Teacher reviews the suggested mini-lesson; group runs the next day.

Day 5

Reteach pattern visible.

Second small-group cycle runs. Review time per claim drops as evidence-anchored signals consolidate around the unit's standards.

Day 10

Prereq graph well-formed.

Cross-cohort patterns surface. Office-hours check-in scheduled. Teacher's grading workflow stabilizes.

By now the plan auto-updates land mostly where the teacher would have chosen.

Day 14

Weekly reteach pattern, sharper plan.

The plan is no longer a static document. Each Sunday, the teacher walks in to a sharper Monday than the week before.

Grading takes substantially less time than Day 1.

What you commit to · what stays

A founding-cohort pilot inside the tools you already use.

Hologram launches inside Canvas via LTI 1.3 and writes grades back where you expect them. The pilot is small enough to inspect and serious enough to prove.

Canvas LTI 1.3

Launch from your LMS.

Roster context, assignment context, and grade passback all inside Canvas. No new student passwords.

Grade passback

Grades land where you expect them.

Designed for LTI Assignment and Grade Services. No spreadsheet re-entry, no double bookkeeping.

FERPA-aligned design

Tenant-scoped, teacher-approval-gated.

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing under every mastery estimate. Peer-reviewed. Teacher approval required before any change persists.

US data residency

Student data stays in US regions.

Deployment assumptions keep tenant data within US-region cloud infrastructure.

1class to start

Try the loop with one section before scaling. Founding-cohort signal: one class, real students, real evidence.

~4 hrsetup, end-to-end

Roster sync from Canvas, first assignment graded, dashboard populated. Most teams land it in an afternoon.

Weeklyoffice hours

Direct access to the team during the founding-cohort window. Prereq-graph debugging, copy edits, custom rubric tweaks — all on the table.

Freeduring early access

No license fee during the founding-cohort window. Reciprocity for the evidence you contribute back to the prereq graph.

What else is in the box

Beyond the loop.

Surface area at a glance

The loop is the spine. Here’s the rest of the surface area Hologram covers.

When your data model starts with mastery, everything changes.

STANDARDS-BASED GRADING

Grade at the standard, not the percentage.

Every assignment maps to state learning standards. Students see mastery per standard, not a single number. Teachers see which standards their class has and hasn’t met from reviewed evidence.

Supports Common Core, NGSS, and state-specific frameworks.

AI SOCRATIC TUTOR

A study buddy that asks the right question, never the answer.

Hologram’s AI tutor uses the prerequisite gap behind a struggle to offer a Socratic question tied to the reviewed evidence. It never lectures. It guides discovery.

Socratic by design · Built on peer-reviewed tutoring research.

TEACHER INTELLIGENCE DASHBOARD

Know what to teach tomorrow before you finish grading today.

Your dashboard shows class-wide mastery patterns, prerequisite bottlenecks, and suggested small-group interventions — all generated from the grading data you already approved. No extra work.

Prerequisite gap detection across subject boundaries.

Try it with one class first.

Hologram is accepting middle school math teams for a focused Fall 2026 founding cohort.

Try Hologram with your classRead the research

Free during early access · Works inside Canvas · FERPA-aligned design

Hologram

The classroom layer built for districts, designed with teachers, and adaptive for every student.

Platform

  • Platform
  • For Teachers
  • For Districts
  • Research

Company

  • About
  • Research
  • Join the cohort
  • Investors
  • Contact

Trust

  • FERPA
  • COPPA
  • LTI 1.3
  • Accessibility
  • Security

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • hello@hologramlearning.com
hologram
© 2026 Hologram Learning, Inc. — All Rights Reserved
PrivacyTermsAccessibilityContact