Skip to main content
Hologram
  • PlatformHow it works →
  • For TeachersPlan once. Grade once. →
  • For DistrictsCompliance as architecture →
  • ResearchBloom · Hattie · BKT →
Try with your class
Student experience · the lesson

A tutor that writes on the whiteboard next to you.

Study Buddy builds the lesson live — drawing diagrams, circling insights, stamping rules, scribbling chemistry. Marcus drags stickies onto the board, fills blanks in the teacher’s handwriting, writes back. Every annotation persists. The whole lesson becomes a whiteboard he can scroll back through.

MJ
Marcus Johnson
7th Grade Science · Ridgeline Middle · Period 4
NGSS 5.PS1-4 · prerequisite remediationLIVE LESSON
Physical vs Chemical Changes
Ms. Garcia watching
1

Physical vs Chemical Changes

(from Quiz 3 — let's nail this)
So… what actually happens when stuff changes?
2Watch this — ice cube melting.
solid iceH₂O · (s)
→
liquid waterH₂O · (l)
→
water vaporH₂O · (g)
What stayed the same through all three?
PHYSICAL
3Now this — iron + oxygen.
4 Fe + 3 O₂→2 Fe₂O₃
new substance!
rust = iron oxide
CHEMICAL
4Which of these are chemical changes?
  • butter meltingPHYSICAL
  • wood burningCHEMICAL
  • iron rustingCHEMICAL
  • paper shreddingPHYSICAL
  • cake bakingCHEMICAL
The rule is:
5
A change is   if a   substance forms. Otherwise it’s  .
6Which of these are signs a chemical change happened?
7Your turn. Drop each change in the right bucket.
Your turn →
Physical
same stuff, different form
Chemical
new stuff, new properties
8
Teach it back in your own words.
0 / 40 chars
9
0.31
Mastery unlocked
NGSS 5.PS1-4 — Physical vs Chemical Changes
+0This session
Developingcurrent tier
✦ Chi, VanLehn · Socratic dialogue produces 2× effect size over passive instruction · Cognitive Science, 2014
Mastery
0.31
Developing
NGSS 5.PS1-4
Progress
Open the question
Ice cube — phases
Beaker — reaction
Classify with stamps
Derive the rule
Word-bank fill
Sort the stickies
Teach it back
Mastery unlock
Session
0:00session
0annotations
0scaffolds
+0.00Δ mastery
What’s tracked

Only the mastery estimate and teacher-visible work. No keystroke logging, no attention tracking.

Reasoning · thinking

A tutor is only as good as the system beneath it.

Socratic dialogue works because every response updates a per‑standard mastery probability in real time. The tutor’s next question is chosen by the model, not scripted.

the technical moat

Every score is a probability —
not a guess.

Hologram’s mastery estimate updates after every response using Bayesian Knowledge Tracing — real math, no LLMs, calibrated to the exact question difficulty.

LC
Ms. Chen
7th Grade Math · Period 2 · Quiz 3
Marcus Johnson · 7.RP.A.2
Live
0.18
P(Mastery)
Beginning
BKTModel parameters
P(L₀)Prior knowledge0.18
P(T)Learning rate0.10
P(G)Guess rate0.20
P(S)Slip rate0.10
Session trajectory · 6 responses+0.81
BKT vs naive scoring
Raw % correct5 of 6 responses
83%
Difficulty-weighted avgweighted by item difficulty
79%
BKT estimateaccounts for guess, slip, hint usage
99%
The last two correct were on hard items with no hint. Strong signal of mastery that raw % averages away.
Response streamQuiz 3 · 7.RP.A.2 · 6 items · oldest ↓
✓
Is y = 3x a proportional relationship?Q1 · easy
⏱ 4.8sno hint
P(L|✓) = 0.18·0.9 / (0.18·0.9 + 0.82·0.2) = 0.497
P(Lₙ) = 0.497 + (1−0.497)·0.10 = 0.55
0.18→
0.55
+0.37
✓
Find the constant of proportionality: 3 : 12, 5 : 20, 7 : ?Q2 · medium
⏱ 6.3sno hint
P(L|✓) = 0.55·0.9 / (0.55·0.9 + 0.45·0.2) = 0.846
P(Lₙ) = 0.846 + (1−0.846)·0.10 = 0.86
0.55→
0.86
+0.31
✗
Graph shows a curve. Is it proportional? Justify.Q3 · hard
⏱ 11.7sno hint
P(L|✗) = 0.86·0.1 / (0.86·0.1 + 0.14·0.8) = 0.435
P(Lₙ) = 0.435 + (1−0.435)·0.10 = 0.49
0.86→
0.49
−0.37
✓
Which table represents a proportional relationship?Q4 · medium
⏱ 14.2s1 hint used
hint → effective guess rate: 0.20 → 0.35P(L|✓) = 0.49·0.9 / (0.49·0.9 + 0.51·0.35) = 0.712
P(Lₙ) = 0.712 + (1−0.712)·0.10 = 0.74
0.49→
0.74
+0.25
✓
Two recipes use different ratios. Explain when they're proportional.Q5 · hard
⏱ 9.1sno hint
P(L|✓) = 0.74·0.9 / (0.74·0.9 + 0.26·0.2) = 0.928
P(Lₙ) = 0.928 + (1−0.928)·0.10 = 0.94
0.74→
0.94
+0.20
✓
Apply proportional reasoning: scaling a recipe for 12 guests.Q6 · transfer
⏱ 5.4sno hint
P(L|✓) = 0.94·0.9 / (0.94·0.9 + 0.06·0.2) = 0.986
P(Lₙ) = 0.986 + (1−0.986)·0.10 = 0.99
0.94→
0.99
+0.05
Starting estimate0.18
Final estimate0.99
Change+0.81
Session12 min 18 sec
Compute time< 4 ms/update
Research basis · Hologram’s BKT implementation
Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledgeCorbett & Anderson (1995)·Contextual slip & guess probabilitiesBaker, Corbett & Aleven (2008)·Individualized BKTYudelson, Koedinger & Gordon (2013)·Deep Knowledge TracingPiech et al. (2015)

Standards as the data model. Everything else follows.

Data model

Standards‑based grading as the primitive.

Every rubric dimension, every criterion, every score — first-class data. Not a tag bolted onto a percentage. The gradebook is the standards graph.

Mastery engine

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, under 4ms per update.

Every response tweaks a per-standard probability. Real probabilistic math — not a heuristic, not a rubric percentage. The dial above updates in real time.

AI grading

Every score anchored to visible evidence.

The AI doesn’t just grade. It highlights the phrases in the response that earned each score. Teachers verify with their eyes, not blind trust.

Audit architecture

Every decision logged. Every action traceable.

FERPA, COPPA, and GDPR compliance is a byproduct of the architecture, not a checklist. Districts get audit evidence on demand.

For teachers →For districts →

See it in your own classroom.

Thirty days, a few classrooms, no production dependency until you say so.

Try Hologram with your class →See the research →

A classroom that learns the student.

hologram

The classroom layer — built for districts, designed with teachers, adaptive for every student.

01Platform

  • For Students
  • For Teachers
  • For Districts
  • Holo AI

02Company

  • About
  • Research
  • Join the cohort
  • Investors
  • Contact

03Trust

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Accessibility
hologramhologram
© 2026 Hologram Learning, Inc.·FERPA compliant · SOC 2 Type II on the roadmap · Models never train on student data