Map
Standards are identified before the score.
The system starts by locating the standard and learning component, then evaluates the visible work.
How it works
Grade at the standard level. Know what to teach next.
Hologram turns one reviewed student artifact into standards evidence, prerequisite insight, and a targeted support path.
01Student submits workA worksheet, typed response, quiz item, or rubric row enters the evidence stream.
02Hologram maps standardsThe response is decomposed into standards and smaller learning components.
03Teacher reviews evidenceDraft scores and feedback stay editable until the teacher approves them.
04Mastery and support updateThe same approval updates dashboards, gaps, and Socratic next questions.
Product story
Follow the full evidence chain.
Start with a score pattern, trace the prerequisite, then watch the teacher-reviewed intervention come into focus.
The Hologram difference
Zoom in on the three at-risk.
Marcus, Olivia, and Diego are all Beginning on 7.RP.A.2 — proportional relationships.
Three rows in a traditional gradebook. One pattern in Hologram.
The gap is three standards back.
Hologram traces the prerequisite graph. 5.OA.A.1 — order of operations — is the common ancestor all three failed to master.
A gradebook sees the grade. Hologram sees the cause.
One assignment. Three targeted students.
Hologram pulls 5 scaffolded questions from the content library — each tagged to a sub-skill of 5.OA.A.1, sequenced easy → hard.
Auto-assigned to the cohort, due before Friday’s quiz. Not three remediation plans.
mastery-heatmap · at-risk cohort3 of 28 studentszoom mode
Student6.RP6.NS7.RP.A.17.RP.A.27.NS.A.17.EE.A.17.EE.B.37.G.A.1
Marcus Johnson AT RISK
Dev
Beg
Dev
Beg
Dev
Beg
Dev
Pro
Olivia Chen AT RISK
Pro
Dev
Dev
Beg
Dev
Pro
Dev
Pro
Diego Martinez AT RISK
Dev
Pro
Dev
Beg
Pro
Dev
Pro
Pro
!
All three are Beginning on 7.RP.A.2. Same standard. Same level. Not coincidence — Hologram can see why.
Prerequisite chain · 7.RP.A.2
Learning Commons API · CASE graph
5.OA.A.1
Order of Operations
48%
ROOT CAUSE6.NS.B.3
Decimal Operations
68%
STABLE6.RP.A.3
Ratio Reasoning
42%
DEPENDENT GAP7.RP.A.2
Proportional Relationships
18%
CURRENT TOPIC✦
Hologram suggests: Targeted practice on 5.OA.A.1 before continuing 7.RP.A.2.
Generate assignment ▸5.OA.A.1Order of Operations · Targeted Practice
Auto-generated from content libraryScaffolded easy → hard5 questions
AI-curated
1Evaluate:3 + 4 × 2multiplication precedence
2Evaluate:(5 + 3) × 2parentheses first
3Evaluate:12 ÷ 4 + 2 × 3multi-operation
4Evaluate:2 + 3 × (4 + 1)mixed, nested
5Simplify ratio:(6 + 2) : (4 × 3)→ bridges 6.RP.A.3
Scores against 3 sub-skills of 5.OA.A.1 · Results feed back to mastery estimate in real time
The loop
Four steps, one evidence chain.
The product is intentionally simple at the surface because the model underneath keeps the relationships intact.
Review
Teachers approve what students see.
Feedback, mastery updates, and next actions remain teacher-governed.
Trace
Prerequisites stay connected.
A current error can reveal an older missing component instead of another broad review packet.
Act
Tomorrow's instruction becomes smaller.
The teacher sees the students, gap, and suggested next step in one place.
Signal quality
What changes after the first grading session.
The standards-level read stays in the teacher workflow and waits for review.
Gradebook, mastery dashboard, and intervention plan are driven by the same evidence.
The architecture is designed to remove parallel spreadsheets and manual grouping.
Checks
The teacher remains the final instructional authority.
Editable drafts
AI output is a draft surface, not a hidden final decision.
Evidence-first scoring
Each recommendation points to the work that produced it.
Standards alignment
Signals are stored against standards and learning components.
Student support
Intervention prompts ask guided questions instead of giving answers.
Ready to see the full loop?
Start with one class and a real assignment. Hologram shows the evidence chain before you expand the workflow.